On the consistency between commuting satisfaction and traveling utility: the case of the University of Luxembourg

  • François Sprumont University of Luxembourg
  • Paola Astegiano KU Leuven
  • Francesco Viti University of Luxembourg

Abstract

According to random utility theory, there is no clear distinction between the utility inferred from observed choices (decision utility), the experienced outcome of decision makers’ (experienced utility) or their retrospective evaluation (remembered utility). While empirical experiments have shown that decision utility and remembered utility do not perfectly coincide, little is known regarding the magnitude of this discrepancy, especially in the transport field. Using a cross-sectional travel survey, the objective of this paper is to quantify the relationship between commuters’ stated choice satisfaction (a proxy for remembered utility) and the Logsum function of the utility of all available modes of transport (decision utility). This is of tremendous importance, as implemented transport policy measures, which aim to increase the overall decision makers’ utility, may have low impact on their satisfaction level and thus be ineffective. Results indicate that the utility Logsum is associated with respondents’ commuting satisfaction. However, context specificities have an important impact on this association.

How to Cite
SPRUMONT, François; ASTEGIANO, Paola; VITI, Francesco. On the consistency between commuting satisfaction and traveling utility: the case of the University of Luxembourg. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, [S.l.], v. 17, n. 2, apr. 2017. ISSN 1567-7141. Available at: <https://journals.library.tudelft.nl/index.php/ejtir/article/view/3193>. Date accessed: 20 may 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2017.17.2.3193.
Published
2017-04-01