Managing Social Condominiums: Strategies for third sector intermediaries to support low‑income homeowners in Chile

  • Luz María Vergara d´Alençon

Abstract

Low-income homeowners face financial and social constraints that are serious challenges to providing adequate maintenance. The fact of owning a property should lead to material progress, security and income opportunities to cope with poverty, however these benefits depend on the capacity of homeowners to keep the property in good condition, and also on the opportunities and support generated by the context and the institutions involved. If these conditions are not guaranteed, low income households are at risk of experiencing unsuccessful ownership processes that may perpetuate poverty conditions. In the case of multi-owned buildings, also known as condominiums, the tension between individual and collective needs also affects maintenance, and entails additional challenges in terms of organisation, social relations and the use of common property areas.

In Chile, subsidies and credit facilities, combined with the massive construction of low-cost housing, enabled low income groups to access homeownership, and social condominiums are a significant part of the affordable owner-occupied housing stock, however after decades of occupancy, this housing stock shows signs of deterioration and devaluation due to neglected maintenance. This situation is the result of a multi-causal problem involving the construction and architectural deficiencies of the dwellings provided, the financial and social constraints of the owners, problems of coexistence and cultural differences between residents of different backgrounds, and deteriorated internal organisations. The challenge of condominium maintenance in Chile is twofold. On the one hand, it includes the financial and social restrictions faced by homeowners that decrease their collective capacity to take care of building maintenance. On the other hand, it includes institutional limitations with regard to housing and condominium management in terms of regulations, institutions, and actors. Given the weak governmental support for maintenance practices and post-occupation process, third sector organisations are positioning themselves as alternatives that provide technical solutions and contribute to improving opportunities among deprived communities.

This thesis explores the role of Chilean third sector organisations as part of the solution to support homeowners in condominium improvement and management. The following research question is asked: what are effective and feasible strategies for third sector organisations to support Chilean low income homeowners in the management of social condominiums?. In order to answer the main question, key questions are organised into three main parts: conceptualisation, analysis and proposal. The general research design is based on case study analysis in order to expand the type and range of solutions, given the limited experience of the Chilean third sector in condominium management activities.

The first part, conceptualisation, presents the societal problem of low income homeownership through the lenses of condominium management and the specific situation of social condominiums in Santiago, Chile. The main findings are the identification of condominium management dimensions and interrelated challenges according to technical, organisational and sociocultural dimensions. Sociocultural problems related to knowledge, the culture of maintenance, trust and individualism were identified as important triggers for organisational and technical problems. The section ends with the development of an analytical framework to describe and evaluate interventions by third sector organisations in condominiums. The core of the framework is the intermediation that comprises the activities and the process developed by the organisation to improve management dimensions, and it is described through three overlapping roles: implementers, catalysts and partners. The framework also includes the concept of institutionalisation, which describes the relationship between the organisation and the institutional framework.

The second part, analysis, comprises the case study analysis of third sector organisations in housing management through one local case (Proyecto Propio, Chile) and two international cases (VVE-010, The Netherlands and SDV, Spain). The Chilean case study focuses on the improvement of deteriorated social condominiums in Santiago, and aims to identify the possibilities and limitations of a local practice. The case of VVE-010 explores the technical and organisational dimensions of condominium management and the role of the municipality in the maintenance of owner-occupied housing stock. The case of SDV explores the sociocultural and organisational dimensions of housing management and the role of civil society organisations in the management of their own neighbourhoods. Given that the practices respond to a particular context and specific community needs, this research follows a systematic process of lesson-drawing to ensure the adequate implementation of the learnings according to the characteristics of the Chilean context.

The third part, proposal, provides a synthesis by combining the lessons of the analysis with a set strategies (and their respective measures) to tackle the management challenges identified in the first part. Two type of strategies were defined by their goals: those aiming at intermediation (i.e. to improve management conditions) and those aiming at institutionalisation (i.e. improving the conditions under which the organisation intervenes). The goals are the following:

To improve built environment conditions, levelling the physical conditions of condominiums

To activate passive communities and promote leadership

To provide training in condominium management

To provide services for long-term administration and maintenance

To promote better coexistence and reduce conflict

To enhance organisational resources to intervene

To improve the institutional capacity in relation to condominium management

The selection of, and priorities for, the application of the strategies were defined by two main variables related to the context, and to the organisation that carries them out, represented in two matrices that define the typologies of the initial situations and management approaches. The typology of the initial situation describes the problems in condominiums according to the management conditions, and municipal capacity in relation to condominium management. The typology of the management approach is defined by the combination of roles and the scope of the intervention, representing overlapping and complementary ways to intermediate in social condominiums. The strategies and the typologies were discussed with third sector organisations and municipalities in a validation process which evaluated the adequacy and relevance of the typologies, and the feasibility and effectiveness of the strategies. Whilst the initial situations are relevant to identify potential barriers and enablers for the intermediation (in relation to municipal capacity) and to prioritise the strategies (in relation to management conditions), the management approaches are relevant to expanding the potential of third sector participation in Chile by promoting specialisation according to the challenges identified.

Feasible and effective strategies with which third sector organisations can support low income homeowners in the management of social condominiums are multi-dimensional, so as to tackle the interrelated challenges. They are developed from the capacity of the third sector organisation as intermediary, meaning that they respond to catalyst and implementer roles to address management challenges at the condominium level by contributing to increase the community’s capacities and level the built environment conditions. Given the social complexities of deprived neighbourhoods, integral interventions, but also trained organisations, are required. The partner role is therefore included to foster the specialisation of third sector organisations and collaboration between local public and private organisations.

Overall, the dissertation addresses the maintenance problem from the external action of third sector intermediaries in order to catalyse better management practices. The strategies altogether seek to achieve autonomous condominiums in which homeowners have the tools and the capacities to maintain an internal organisation, and have access to the professional services that allow them to provide adequate maintenance in the long-term, and manage the existing but limited resources efficiently.

The dissertation contributes to filling knowledge gaps regarding the concept of housing management in the Latin American context. It also proposes a problem-solving perspective by introducing the role of third sector intermediaries as one of the solutions, exploring different approaches and respective strategies to intermediate in the field of condominium management. The main limitations of the study are related to the specific applicability of the strategies to the Chilean context, but further developments are related to action research exploration, and an evaluation of the capacity of civil society organisations such as neighbourhood associations in the management of their own neighbourhoods.

References

Acquaye, L. (2011). Low-income homeowners and the challenges of home maintenance. Community Development, 42(1), 16-33.
Agger, A., & Jensen, J. O. (2015). Area-based Initiatives—And Their Work in Bonding, Bridging and Linking Social Capital. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2045-2061. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.998172
Aguirre, C., d’Alencon, R., Justiniano, C., & Faverio, F. (2006). Lineamientos generales para la terminación y ampliación de las viviendas sociales dinámicas sin deuda. In P. U. C. d. C. Centro de Políticas Públicas UC (Ed.), Propuestas para Chile - Camino al Bicentenario. Santiago, Chile.
Araos, C. (2008). La tensión entre conyugalidad y filiación en la génesis empírica del allegamiento. Estudio cualitativo comparado entre familias pobres de Santiago de Chile. . (Master), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santtiago.
Aravena, S., & Sandoval, A. (2005). El diagnostico de los pobladores “con techo”. In A. Rodríguez & A. Sugranyes (Eds.), Los con techo : un desafío para la política de vivienda social. Providencia, Santiago de Chile: Ediciones SUR.
Ariff, N. R. M., & Davies, H. (2011). Multi-owner low-cost housing management in Malaysia: Effects of owner-occupant characteristics and occupancy rates. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 4(3), 268-289. doi: doi:10.1108/17538271111153031
Baruah, B. (2015). NGOs as intermediaries in post-disaster rural reconstruction: findings from research in India. Development in Practice, 25(7), 951-965. doi: 10.1080/09614524.2015.1072132
Bond, L., Kearns, A., Mason, P., Tannahill, C., Egan, M., & Whitely, E. (2012). Exploring the relationships between housing, neighbourhoods and mental wellbeing for residents of deprived areas. Bmc Public Health, 12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-48
Boterman, W. R., & van Gent, W. P. C. (2014). Housing Liberalisation and Gentrification: The Social Effects of Tenure Conversions in Amsterdam. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 105(2), 140-160. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12050
Brain, I., Iacobelli, A., & Sabatini, F. (2005). Calidad y Valor de la Vivienda Social: Un problema de localización y Barrio (pp. 20).
Brain, I., Mora, P., Rasse, A., & Sabatini, F. (2009). Report on social housing Chile. Santiago, Chile: ProUrbana. Centro de Políticas Públicas UC.
Brandsen, T., van de Donk, W., & Putters, K. (2005). Griffins or Chameleons? Hybridity as a Permanent and Inevitable Characteristic of the Third Sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(9-10), 749-765.
Bredenoord, J., & van Lindert, P. (2010). Pro-poor housing policies: Rethinking the potential of assisted self-help housing. Habitat International, 34(3), 278-287. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.12.001
Camargo, A., & Hurtado, A. (2011). Vivienda y pobreza: una relación compleja. Marco conceptual y caracterización de Bogotá. Cuadernos de Vivienda y Urbanismo, 4(8), 23.
Cannobbio, L., L., A., Espinoza, A., Jeri, T., Jimenez, F., Rieutord, F., . . . Urcullo, G. (2011). Investigación del funcionamiento de las Entidades de Gestión Inmobiliaria y Social en la Política Habitacional.
Carpenter, J. (2013). Social enterprise and urban regeneration: A model for the future? Calitatea Vietii, 2013(2), 137-156.
Castillo, M. J. (2013). Producción y gestión habitacional de los pobladores. Articulación con la política de vivienda y barrio trayectoria y problemática actual. (Doctor), Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura.
Castillo, M. J. (2014). The ability of residents: The innovative potential for Chilean Housing Policy. Revista INVI, 29(81), 67-90.
Cavalheiro, D. D., & Abiko, A. (2015). Evaluating slum (favela) resettlements: The case of the Serra do Mar Project, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Habitat International, 49, 340-348. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.014
Chen, S. C. Y., & Webster, C. J. (2005). Homeowners Associations, Collective Action and the Costs of Private Governance. Housing Studies, 20(2), 205-220. doi: 10.1080/026730303042000331736
Chile, G. d. (2015). Panorama y proyecciones de la economía social y cooperativa en Chile. Santiago, Chile: Gobierno de Chile.
Chu, F. N., Chang, C. O., & Sing, T. F. (2013). Collective Action Dilemmas in Condominium Management. Urban Studies, 50(1), 128-147. doi: 10.1177/0042098012452327
Clapham, D., Franklin, B., & Saugeres, L. (2010). Housing management: the social construction of an occupational role. Housing Theory and Society, 17(2), 68-82. doi: 10.1080/140360900457740
Clark, J., & Kearns, A. (2012). Housing Improvements, Perceived Housing Quality and Psychosocial Benefits From the Home. Housing Studies, 27(7), 915-939. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2012.725829
Cornejo, C. A. (2012). Estigma territorial como forma de violencia barrial: El caso del sector El Castillo of El Castillo. Revista INVI, 27(76), 177-200.
Crankshaw, O., Gilbert, A., & Morris, A. (2000). Backyard Soweto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(4), 841-+. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00282
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Third ed.). United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Crossan, D., & Til, J. V. (2009). Towards a Classification Framework for Not-For-Profit Organisations: The Importance of Measurement Indicators. Paper presented at the EMES.
Czischke, D. (2013). Social Innovation in Housing: Learning from practice across Europe.
Czischke, D., Gruis, V., & Mullins, D. (2012). Conceptualising Social Enterprise in Housing Organisations. Housing Studies, 27(4), 418-437. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2012.677017
De Jong, M., & Edelenbos, J. (2007). An Insider’s Look into Policy Transfer in Transnational Expert Networks. European Planning Studies, 15(5), 687-706. doi: 10.1080/09654310701213996
Defourny, J. (2009). Concepts and Realities of Social Enterprise: A European Perspective. Collegium(Spring), 73-98.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2014). Social innovation, social economy and social enterprise: what can the European debate tell us? In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation : collective action, social. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing L.
Delamaza, G. (2010). Construcción democrática, participación ciudadana y políticas públicas en Chile. (Doctor), Universiteit Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Delamaza, G. (2013). Quién eres, qué haces y quién te financia. Transparencia y roles cambiantes de las organizaciones de la sociedad civil. Revista Española del Tercer Sector, 23(Septiembre-Diciembre 2013).
DESUC. (2017). Estudios factores que influyen en el allegamiento interno y externo (pp. 106): Dirección de Estudios Sociales (DESUC), Instituto de Sociología. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance, 13(1), 5-23. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00121
Donoso, R. (2013). Governance of condominium affordable housing in Latin America; a network analysis. Paper presented at the RC43 Conference. “At home with the housing market”, University of Amsterdam, July 10-12, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Donoso, R. (2014). Instituciones de Propiedad Horizontal y política de vivienda de interés social. Comparando Bogotá y Quito. Paper presented at the IV CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL DE CONSTRUCCIÓN DE INFRAESTRUCTURA Y VIVIENDA. “MODELO DE DESARROLLO URBANO Y GENERACIÓN DE PROYECTOS DE VIVIENDA DE INTERÉS SOCIAL”, Quito, Ecuador.
Donoso, R. E., & Elsinga, M. (2016). Management of low-income condominiums in Bogotá and Quito: the balance between property law and self-organisation. International Journal of Housing Policy, 1-23. doi: 10.1080/14616718.2016.1248608
Ducci, M. E. (1997). Chile: el lado obscuro de una política de vivienda exitosa. EURE (Santiago), 23(69), 99-115.
Ducci, M. E. (1998). Santiago, ¿una mancha de aceite sin fin?¿Qué pasa con la población cuando la ciudad crece indiscriminadamente? EURE (Santiago), 24, 85-94.
Ducci, M. E. (2007). La política habitacional como instrumento de desintegración social. Efectos de una política de vivienda exitosa. In M. J. Castillo & R. Hidalgo Dattwyler (Eds.), 1906/2006 : cien años de política de vivienda en Chile. Santiago, Chile: Universidad Nacional Andrés Bello ; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile ; Universidad Central de Venezuela
Dunowicz, R., Hasse, R., Boselli, T., & Amarilla, B. (2004). SOCIAL HOUSING PERFORMANCE IN ARGENTINA: THE LAST DECADES. Paper presented at the Building for the Future: The 16th CIB World Building Congress 2004, Rotterdam (Netherlands).
Edwards-Schachter, M., & Wallace, M. L. (2017). ‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 64-79. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.012
Elsinga, M. (1998). The meaning of tenure under different conditions; empirical evidence from the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 13(2), 137-155. doi: 10.1007/BF02497226
Elsinga, M., & Hoekstra, J. (2005). Homeownership and housing satisfaction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20(4), 401-424. doi: 10.1007/s10901-005-9023-4
Elsinga, M., Hoekstra, J., & Dol, K. (2014). Financial implications of affordable home ownership products: four Dutch products in international perspective. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment.
Espinoza, V. (2014). Local Associations in Chile: Social Innovation in a Mature Neoliberal Society. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation : collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing L.
Evans, M. (2009). Policy transfer in critical perspective. Policy Studies, 30(3), 243-268. doi: 10.1080/01442870902863828
Fernández-Maldonado, A. M., & Bredenoord, J. (2010). Progressive housing approaches in the current Peruvian policies. Habitat International, 34(3), 342-350. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.11.018
FRAVM. (2005). Una FRAVM fuerte con asociaciones de vecinos representativas. Memoria de la FRAVM 2002-2004. Madrid, Spain.
FRAVM. (2008). Memoria y Renovacion. Memoria FRAVM 2005-2007. Madrid, Spain.
FRAVM. (2014a). Dinamizacion Vecinal Recorrido, reflexvion, accion. Memoria 2009-2013. Madrid, Spain.
FRAVM. (2014b). Dinamizacion Vecinal Madrid. Internal document. Madrid, Spain.
Fromm, D. (2012). Seeding Community: Collaborative housing as a strategy for social and neighbourhood repair. Built Environment, 38(3), 364-394.
Fundacion Proyecto Propio. 2016, from http://www.proyectopropio.cl/
Gao, L. W., & Ho, D. C. W. (2016). Explaining the outcomes of multi-owned housing management: A collective action perspective. Habitat International, 57, 233-241.
Gatica, K., Quinteros, C., Vásquez, L., & Yañez, L. (2015). Economias solidarias y territorios: el emprendimiento comunitario como factor clave de desarrollo en Chile. Paper presented at the Coloquio Internacional de Economía social y solidaria en un contexto de multiculturalidad, diversidad y desarrollo territorial, UNCuyo-Université Blaise Pascal – Mendoza.
Gatica, S. (2011). Emprendimiento e Innovación Social: construyendo una agenda pública para Chile. doi:http://www.superacionpobreza.cl/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/20111227174334.pdf
Gilbert, A. (2004). Helping the poor through housing subsidies: lessons from Chile, Colombia and South Africa. Habitat International, 28(1), 13-40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00070-X
Gilbert, A. (2014). Free housing for the poor: An effective way to address poverty? Habitat International, 41(0), 253-261. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.08.009
Gonzalez, S., Moulaert, F., & Martinelli, F. (2011). ALMOLIN. How to analyse social innovation at the local level? In F. Moulaert, F. Martinelli, E. Swyngedouw & S. Gonzalez (Eds.), Can neighbourhoods save the city? : community development and social innovation. London :: Routledge.
Gough, K. V., & Kellett, P. (2001). Housing consolidation and home-based income generation: Evidence from self-help settletments in two Colombian cities. Cities, 18(4), 235-247. doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00016-6
Greene, M., & Rojas, E. (2008). Incremental construction: A strategy to facilitate access to housing. Environment and Urbanization, 20(1), 89-108.
Gruis, V., Nieboer, N., & Thomas, A. (2004). Strategic asset management in the social rented sector: Approaches of Dutch and English housing associations. Urban Studies, 41(7), 1229-1248. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000214761
Gruis, V., Nieboer, N., & Tsenkova. (2010). Management of Privatised Housing: International Approaches and Challenges. Paper presented at the Compartive Houisng researcg-Approaches and Policy Challenges in a New International Era, Delft, Netherlands.
Gruis, V., Nieboer, N., & Tsenkova, S. (2009). Conclusion Management of privatizad housing: internacional policies & practise. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Gruis, V., Tsenkova, S., & Nieboer, N. (2009). Introduction. In V. Gruis, N. Nieboer & S. Tsenkova (Eds.), Management of privatizad housing: internacional policies & practise. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Gruis, V., Tsenkova, S., & Nieboer, N. (2009). Management of privatised housing : international policies & practice. Chichester, U.K. ;: Wiley-Blackwell Pub.
Hastings, I. (2008). The qualitative problem in the low-income habitat production in Mexico City: qualitative analysis of the low-income housing. Informes De La Construccion, 60(511), 25-40.
Hegedüs, J. (2012). Homeowners’ Associations in Post-Socialist Countries. In S. J. Smith (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home (pp. 161-166). San Diego: Elsevier.
Hidalgo, R. ( 2005). La vivienda social en Chile y la construcción del espacio urbano en el Santiago del s. XX. Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Centro de Investigaciones Diego Barros Arana.
Hsieh, H. R. (2009). Issues and proposed improvements regarding condominium management in Taiwan. Habitat International, 33(1), 73-80. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.05.002
Hynes, H. P., Brugge, D., Watts, J., & Lally, J. (2000). Public health and the physical environment in Boston public housing: A community-based survey and action agenda. Planning Practice and Research, 15(1-2), 31-49.
Irarrazabal, I., Hairel, E. M. H., Wojciech, S., & Salamon, L. M. (2006). Estudio Comparativo del Sector Sin Fines de Lucro, Chile: John Hopkins University.
Irarrazabal, I., & Streeter, P. (2016). Mapa de las Organziaciones de la Sociedad Civil 2015. In S. e. Accion (Ed.). Santiago, Chile: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile.
Irarrazabal, I., & Streeter, P. (2017). Sociedad en Acción. Construyendo Chile desde las organizaciones de la sociedad civil. Santiago, Chile: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
Jacobs, K., & Manzi, T. (2000). Performance indicators and social constructivism: Conflict and control in housing management. Critical Social Policy, 20(1), 85-103.
Janssen-Jansen, L., Spaans, M., & Van der Veen, M. (2008). New instruments in spatial planning: An international perspective on non-financial compensation. Retrieved from WorldCat.org database. IOS Press.
Jong, M., & Stoter, S. (2009). Institutional Transplantation and the Rule of Law: How This Interdisciplinary Method Can Enhance the Legitimacy of International Organisations. Erasmus Law Review, 3, 311-330.
Kaztman, R., & Filgueira, C. (2001). Marco conceptual sobre activos, vulnerabilidad y estructura de oportunidades.: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe CEPAL. Oficina de Montevideo.
Kemeny, J. (1981). The myth of home-ownership : Private versus public choices in housing tenure (R. d. editions. Ed.). London: Routledge & Kegaul.
Kessler, G., & Di Virgilio, M. M. (2008). The new urban poverty: global, regional and Argentine dynamics during the last two decades. Cepal Review(95), 31-50.
Kutty, N. K. (2005). A new measure of housing affordability: Estimates and analytical results. Housing Policy Debate, 16(1), 113-142. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2005.9521536
Lang, R., & Novy, A. (2014). Cooperative Housing and Social Cohesion: The Role of Linking Social Capital. European Planning Studies, 22(8), 1744-1764. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.800025
Larenas, J., Cannobbio, L., & Zamorano, H. (2016). Informe final de evaluación Programa de Mejoramiento de Condominios Sociales y Programam de Regeneración de Condominios Sociales (ex Programam de Recuperación de Condominios Sociales, segunda oportunidad): Subsecretaría de Vivienda y Urbanismo, Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo.
Larenas, J., & Lange, C. (2017). Temas emergentes para la politica publica urbano habitacional en Chile Documento de Trabajo INVI (Vol. 6): Institutio de la Vivienda, Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo, Universidad de Chile.
Lee, Y. S. F. (1998). Intermediary institutions, community organizations, and urban environmental management: the case of three Bangkok slums. World Development, 26(6), 993-1011. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00034-5
Lewis, D. (2002). The Management of Non-governmental Development Organizations: An Introduction David Lewis. London: Routledge.
Lewis, D. (2003). Theorizing the organization and management of non-governmental development organizations. Public Management Review, 5(3), 325-344. doi: 10.1080/1471903032000146937
Liias, R. (2007). Housing maintenance management: The key-factor when creating healthy environment. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 30(3-4), 457-470.
Liou, Y. T., & Stroh, R. C. (1998). Community development intermediary systems in the United States: Origins, evolution, and functions. Housing Policy Debate, 9(3), 575-594.
Marcuse, P. (1972). Homeownership for Low Income Families: Financial Implications. Land Economics, 48(2).
Marquez, F. (2005). De lo material y lo simbólico en la vivienda social. In A. Rodríguez & A. Sugranyes (Eds.), Los con techo : un desafío para la política de vivienda social. Providencia, Santiago de Chile: Ediciones SUR.
McKee, K. (2007). Community ownership in Glasgow: The devolution of wonership and control, or a centralizing process? European Journal of Housing Policy, 7(3), 319-336.
Meijer, F., & Visscher, H. (2015). Dutch Municipalities and the quality of the owner-occupied housing stock. Paper presented at the COBRA 2015. RICS International Research Conference, Australia.
Meijer, F. M., Tambach, M., & Visscher, H. J. (2012). Owner-occupiers and the quality of their dwellings. Paper presented at the RICS COBRA 2012, Proceedings of the Construction, Building and Real Estate Conference, Las Vegas, USA, 11-13 September 2012.
DS255. Reglamento Programa Protección al Patrimonio Familiar (2006).
Ley 20.741 Modifica la ley N° 19.537, Sobre Copropiedad Inmobiliaria para facilitar la administracion de copropiedades y la presentación de proyectos de mejoramiento o ampliacion de condominios de viviendas sociales, 20.741 C.F.R. (2014a).
MINVU. (2014b). Vivienda Social en Copropiedad. Catastro Nacional de Condominios Sociales. Santiago de Chile: Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo.
MINVU. (2014c). Vivienda Social en Copropiedad. Memoria de Tipologias de Condominios Sociales. Santiago de Chile: Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo.
MINVU. (2015). Proveedores Tecnicos MINVU. 2015, from http://proveedorestecnicos.minvu.gob.cl/entidades-patrocinantes/
Ley 19.537 de Copropiedad Inmobiliaria (2015a).
MINVU. (2018). Observatorio Urbano. 2018, from http://www.observatoriourbano.cl/estadisticas-habitacionales/
Miranda, P., C., C., M., R., A., M., R., A., & S., C. (2013). Hacia una noción de Procedimentalidad Apuntes de Tecnología Social: Centro de Estudios Sociales. Proyecto Propio.
Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained:Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76. doi: 10.1177/2345678906292462
Moser, C. O. N. (1998). The asset vulnerability framework: Reassessing urban poverty reduction strategies. World Development, 26(1), 1-19. doi: 10.1016/s0305-750x(97)10015-8
Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., & Hillier, J. (2014). Social innovation: intuition, precept, concept, theory and practice. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation : collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing L.
Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (2014). General introduction: the return of social innovation as a scientific concept and a social practice. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation : collective action, social. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing L.
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969-1990. doi: 10.1080/00420980500279893
Mukhija, V. (2002). An analytical framework for urban upgrading: property rights, property values and physical attributes. Habitat International, 26(4), 553-570. doi: 10.1016/s0197-3975(02)00019-x
Mullins, D., Czischke, D., & van Bortel, G. (2012). Exploring the Meaning of Hybridity and Social Enterprise in Housing Organisations. Housing Studies, 27(4), 405-417. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2012.689171
Municipality of Rotterdam (2015). Steigers op Zuid Uitvoeringsprogramma particuliere woningvoorraad 2015 – 2018.
Muñoz, T. L. (2011). Evolución el espacio doméstico en “Blocks” de vivienda social. Autoconstrucción y vulnerabilidad en conjuntos de vivienda básica. Revista CIS. Centro de Investigación Social de Un Techo para Chile.
Murtagh, B., & McFerran, K. (2015). Adaptive utilitarianism, social enterprises and urban regeneration. Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, 33(6), 1585-1599. doi: 10.1177/0263774x15614151
Netherland VvE. Retrieved 26-07-2016, 2016, from https://www.nederlandvve.nl/
Oezler, S. I. (2012). The Concertacion and Homelessness in Chile Market-based Housing Policies and Limited Popular Participation. Latin American Perspectives, 39(4), 53-70. doi: 10.1177/0094582x10397917
Olson, M., Jr. (1982). The logic of collective action : public goods and the theory of groups (9th print. ed.). Cambridge, Mass., [etc.] :: Harvard University Press.
Oosterlynck, S., Kasepov, Y., Novy, A., Cools, P., Barberis, E., Wukovitsch, F., . . . Leubolt, B. (2013). The butterfly and the elephant: local social innovation, the welfare state and new poverty dynamics ImPRovE. Poverty Reduction in Europe: Social Policy and Innovation (Vol. Discussion paper N.13/03).
Orellana, A. (2018). ICVU 2018. Índice de Calidad de Vida Urbana Comunas y Ciudades de Chile: Instituto de Estudios Urbanos y Territoriales. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action.
Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
Pérez, A. (2009). Copropiedad Inmobiliaria. Precariedad y organización: el caso del condominio Quillayes de la comuna de La Florida. (Master), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Pizarro, R. (2010). El tercer sector en Chile: las organizaciones de acción social en el ámbito comunal. (Doctor), Universidad de Granada, España, Editorial de la Universidad de Granada. Retrieved from http://hera.ugr.es/tesisugr/1893014.pdf
Pradel Miquel, M., Garcia Cabeza, M., & Eizaguirre Anglada, S. (2014). Theorizing multi-level governance in social innovation dynamics. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation : collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing L.
Priemus, H., Dieleman, F., & Clapham, D. (1999). Current developments in social housing management. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 14(3), 211-223. doi: 10.1007/BF02496678
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy: Princeton University Press.
Rodriguez, A., & Sugranyes, A. (2005). El problema de vivienda de los “con techo”. In A. Rodriguez & A. Sugranyes (Eds.), Los con techo. Un desafío para la política de vivienda social. Providencia, Santiago de Chile: Ediciones SUR.
Rodríguez, A., & Sugranyes, A. (2005). Los con techo : un desafío para la política de vivienda social. Providencia, Santiago de Chile: Ediciones SUR.
Rohe, W. M., & Stegman, M. A. (1994a). The effects of homeownership - on the self-esteem, perceived control and life satisfaction of low-income people. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(2), 173-184. doi: 10.1080/01944369408975571
Rohe, W. M., & Stegman, M. A. (1994b). THE IMPACT OF HOME OWNERSHIP ON THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT OF LOW-INCOME PEOPLE. Urban Affairs Review, 30(1), 152-172.
Rohe, W. M., & Stewart, L. S. (1996). Homeownership and neighborhood stability. Housing Policy Debate, 7(1), 37-81.
Rohe, W. M., van Zandt, G., & McCarthy, G. (2001). The Social Benefits and Cost of Homeownership: A Critical Assessment of Research Low-income Homeownership working papers. Boston, USA: Joint Center of Housing Studies of Harvard University, Boston.
Rolnik, R., Pereira, A., Moreira, F., Royer, L., Iacovini, R., Nisida, V., . . . Rossi, L. (2015). O programa Minha Casa Minha Vida nas Regiões Metropolitanas de São Paulo e Campinas: aspectos socioespaciais e segregação. 2015, 17(33), 28. doi: 10.1590/18863
Rose, R. (2002). Ten Steps in Learning Lessons from Abroad EUI RSC; 2002/05.
Rubio Vollert, R. (2006). Lecciones de la política de vivienda en Chile. Bitacora, 10(1), 197-206.
Ruprah, I. (2010). Do social housing programs increase poverty?: An empirical analysis of shelter induced poverty in Latin America.
Sabatini, F., Cáceres, G., & Cerda, J. (2001). Segregación residencial en las principales ciudades chilenas: Tendencias de las tres últimas décadas y posibles cursos de acción. EURE (Santiago), 27, 21-42.
Saborido, M., Miranda, M., & Zamorano, H. (2010). Informe final de evaluación Programa de Asistencia Técnica y Social: Subsecretaría de Vivienda y Urbanismo, Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo.
Sagredo, M. (2010). Panoramas de la Egis en la Región Metropolitana. Documento de trabajo 8. Retrieved from http://www.techo.org website: http://www.techo.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/8Panorama_EGIS_RM.pdf
Salcedo, R. (2010). The Last Slum: Moving from Illegal Settlements to Subsidized Home Ownership in Chile. Urban Affairs Review, 46(1), 90-118. doi: 10.1177/1078087410368487
Sanderson, D., Sharma, A., & Anderson, J. (2012). NGO permanent housing 10 years after the Gujarat earthquake: revisiting the FICCI-CARE Gujarat rehabilitation programme. Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), 233-247. doi: 10.1177/0956247811431218
Saunders, P. R. (1990). A nation of home owners. London [etc.] :: Unwin Hyman.
Segovia, O. (2005). Habitar en conjuntos de vivienda social: ¿como constuir identidad, confianza y participacion social? In A. Rodríguez & A. Sugranyes (Eds.), Los con techo : un desafío para la política de vivienda social. Providencia, Santiago de Chile: Ediciones SUR.
Smeets, J., Dogge, P., Soeterboek, R., & Tsenkova, S. (2009). The Netherlands. In V. Gruis, S. Tsenkova, N. Nieboer & I. Wiley (Eds.), Management of privatised housing : international policies & practice. Chichester, U.K: Wiley-Blackwell Pub.
Smithson, J. (2000). Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(2), 103-119. doi: 10.1080/136455700405172
Soto, F., & Viveros, F. (2016). Las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil desde su marco juridico e institucional. In S. e. Accion (Ed.). Santiago, Chile: Pontificia Universidad Catolica.
Spaans, M., & Louw, E. (2009). Crossing borders with planners and developers: the limits of lesson-drawing. Paper presented at the EURA’09: City Futures, Madrid.
Stone, D. (2000). Non-Governmental Policy Transfer: The Strategies of Independent Policy Institutes. Governance, 13(1), 45-70. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00123
Straub, A. (2002). Strategic technical management of housing stock: lessons from Dutch housing associations. Building Research and Information, 30(5), 372-381. doi: 10.1080/09613210210150955
Straub, A. (2004, 2-6 July 2004). Housing management and maintenance practise of Dutch housing associations. Paper presented at the ENHR 2004 conference Cambridge.
Straub, A. (2012). Maintenance and Repair. In S. J. Smith (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home (pp. 186-194). San Diego: Elsevier.
Ley N. 18.695, Organica Constitucional de Municipalidades (2006).
SUBDERE. (2018). Sistema Nacional de Información Municipal, SINIM. http://datos.sinim.gov.cl/
Sugranyes, A. (2005). La política habitacional en Chile, 1980-2000: un éxito liberal para dar techo a los pobres. In A. Rodríguez & A. Sugranyes (Eds.), Los con techo. Un desafío para la política de vivienda social. Providencia, Santiago, Chile: Ediciones SUR.
Sugranyes, A. (2006). Social Housing Policy in Chile since 1980. Actors and Products.
Sukumar, G. (2001). Institutional potential of housing cooperatives for low-income households: The case of India. Habitat International, 25(2), 147-174. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(00)00022-9
Tapia Zarricueta, R. (2011). Vivienda social en Santiago de Chile: Análisis de su comportamiento locacional, período 1980- 2002. Revista INVI, 26, 105-131.
Teasdale, S. (2009). Can Social Enterprise Address Social Exclusion? Evidence from an Inner City Community: hird Sector Research Centre, Working Paper 3, Birmingham, Third Centre Research Centre,.
Teles, R., & González, M. S. (2013). Social housing enlargement - Case of study: Ivoti - Brazil. Revista Ingenieria de Construccion, 28(3), 237-250.
Tello-Rozas, S. (2016). Inclusive Innovations Through Social and Solidarity Economy Initiatives: A Process Analysis of a Peruvian Case Study. Voluntas, 27(1), 61-85. doi: 10.1007/s11266-015-9606-y
Tironi, M. (2003). Nueva Pobreza Urbaba. Vivienda y capital social en Santiago de Chile, 1985-2001. Santiago: PREDES-Editorial RIL.
Torres, M., Quezada, M., Rioseco, R., & Ducci, M. E. (2008). Quality of life of elderly subjects living in basic social dwellings. Revista Medica de Chile, 136(3), 325-333.
UC (2012). La innovacion social en Chile y el rol del Estado en su desarrollo. Santiago, Chile: Escuela de Adnimistracion UC.
Urrutia, J., Jiron, P., & Lagos, A. (2016). ¿Allegamiento o Co-residencia? Revista CA. Ciudad y Arquitectura, 152.
Valladares, A. (2013). The Community Architect Program: Implementing participation-in-design to improve housing conditions in Cuba. Habitat International, 38, 18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.09.004
van Overmeeren, A., Gruis, V., & Haffner, M. (2010). Performance assessment of housing associations. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25(1), 139-151. doi: 10.1007/s10901-009-9172-y
Van Zandt, S., & Rohe, W. M. (2011). The sustainability of low-income homeownership: the incidence of unexpected costs and needed repairs among low-income home buyers. Housing Policy Debate, 21(2), 317-341. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2011.576525
Vergara, L. M. (2016). Gestión de la Vivienda Social. Hechos, desafíos y campos de acción. Revista CA. Ciudad y Arquitectura, 152.
Vergara, L. M., Gruis, V., & Van der Flier, K. (2016). The intermediary role of social enterprises in the management of affordable condominiums. Evidence from a Chilean case study. Paper presented at the ENHR Conference 2016. Governance, Territory and Housing, Belfast, Northern Ireland, 28 June - 1 July 2016.
Vergara, L. (2018). Social Innovation in Condominium Management. The Intermediary Role of Third Sector Organisations in Supporting Low-income Homeowners In Y. Franz, H. Heinrich Blotevogel & R. Danielzyk (Eds.), Social innovation in urban and regional development. Perspectives on an emerging field in planning and urban studies (Vol. 47, pp. 83-102). Vienna: OWA. Austrian Academy of Science.
Vicari, S., & Tornaghi, C. (2014). A transversal reading of social innonvation in European cities. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation : collective action, social. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing L.
Walker, R. M. (2000). The changing management of social housing: The impact of externalisation and managerialisation. Housing Studies, 15(2), 281-299. doi: Doi 10.1080/02673030082397
Ward, P. M. (2012). “A Patrimony for the Children”: Low-Income Homeownership and Housing (Im)Mobility in Latin American Cities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(6), 1489-1510. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.628260
Wormald, G., Cereceda, L., & Ugalde, P. (2002). Estructura de Oportunidades y Vulnerabilidad Social. In R. Kaztman & G. Wormald (Eds.), Trabajo y Ciudadanía. Los cambiantes rostros de la integración y exclusión social en cuatro áreas metropolitanas de América Latina (1° edition ed., pp. 325-397). Montevideo: Cebra.
Yau, Y. (2013). Willingness to participate in collective action: the case of multiowned housing management. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(2), 153-171. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00621.x
Yazan, B. (2015). Three Approaches to Case Study Methods in Education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134-152.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research : design and methods (Fifth edition. ed.). Los Angeles :: SAGE.
How to Cite
VERGARA D´ALENÇON, Luz María. Managing Social Condominiums. A+BE | Architecture and the Built Environment, [S.l.], n. 28, p. 390, nov. 2018. ISSN 2214-7233. Available at: <https://journals.library.tudelft.nl/index.php/abe/article/view/2774>. Date accessed: 20 feb. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.7480/abe.2018.28.
Published
2018-11-01